London Borough of Lewisham (24 022 568)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s review of suitability of Miss X’s temporary accommodation. It was reasonable for her to appeal against the decision to the County Court if she wished to challenge it.

The complaint

  1. Miss X says she believes the Council’s review of the suitability of her temporary accommodation failed to give sufficient priority to her complaints about affordability and medical needs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s review.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says the Council did not properly consider her circumstances when it carried out a review of her temporary accommodation under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996. She says she asked in her review request for medical issues to be considered and also the affordability of the property.
  2. The Council’s review referred to these matters in some detail, but Miss X disagrees with the outcome.
  3. We cannot overturn a decision on a homelessness matter, including a review about suitability of accommodation. This is because the legislation offers a review and appeal procedure and we would expect someone to use this. Miss X has already used the review process and the Council’s review decision clearly referred her to the right of appeal afforded under s.204 of the Housing Act within 21 days.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s review of suitability of Miss X’s temporary accommodation. It was reasonable for her to appeal against the decision to the County Court if she wished to challenge it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings