Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 018 697)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council considered Miss X’s housing application. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained that the Council did not take her circumstances into account when considering her housing application.
  2. Miss X complained that this caused her stress and is having an impact on her mental health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X was excluded from the Council’s housing register in 2018 due to housing-related debts and antisocial behaviour. Miss X was given a letter explaining the conditions that needed to be met to rejoin the housing register.
  2. Miss X submitted a fresh housing application to the Council which was declined. Miss X asked the Council to review that decision, which it did. It upheld the decision and explained the debt needed to be paid before she could rejoin the housing register.
  3. Miss X escalated her complaint and received a stage two response. The stage two response considered the Council’s allocations policy, Miss X previous exclusion, information from children’s services in support of Miss X’s application and her current housing. The Council upheld its previous decision.
  4. We are not an appeal body. It is not our role to say whether the Council’s decision was correct. Unless we find fault in the Council’s decision-making process, we cannot comment on the decision reached. The law says councils must allocate social housing in line with their published scheme.
  5. The Council considered its published scheme and explained its reasons for deciding Miss X did not qualify to join its housing register. Although it did not specifically explain how it considered the circumstances that led to housing-related debt, the decision is in line with its scheme. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings