London Borough of Bromley (24 018 684)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s offer of alternative temporary accommodation which Miss X says was unsuitable. It was reasonable for her to appeal to the court following a review of suitability of the accommodation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council’s offer of alternative accommodation following an incident her previous accommodation. She says the offered property was too far away form her family and local networks and made it difficult for her to get to work which is over an hour away.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s review of suitability.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X was living in temporary accommodation when there was a stabbing incident at her home. she asked the Council to provide her with alternative accommodation for her and her daughters. The Council offered her a 3-bedroom flat which was located 20 miles from her current home.
  2. Miss X says the accommodation was unsuitable because it was too far from her family networks and her employment. She asked the Council to review the suitability of the offer under s.202 of the housing Act 1996 part 7. The Council carried out the review in August 2024 and it concluded that the accommodation was suitable for Miss X’s needs and that there were good transport links and local medical, education and shopping facilities. It was also affordable for her budget.
  3. The Council’s decision letter advised Miss X of her right to challenge the review decision to the County Court within 21 days. Miss X did not challenge the decision and she complained to us in January 2025.
  4. We will not investigate this compalint because it was reasonable for Miss X to challenge the review of suitability decision by appealing to the court at the time.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s offer of alternative temporary accommodation which Miss X says was unsuitable. It was reasonable for her to appeal to the court following a review of suitability of the accommodation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings