Bedford Borough Council (24 017 427)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision on her homelessness application. If she disagreed with the decision, it was reasonable for her to request a review, and if she remained unhappy after the review, to appeal to the county court.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained about a Council decision that she was not homeless or at risk of homelessness and so it would not provide her with housing support.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X submitted a homelessness application to the Council. The Council considered her application including seeking advice and information from relevant agencies. It decided that she was not homeless or at risk of homelessness and so it would not provide her with housing support. It advised her she had a right to request a review of this decision.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. If Ms X was dissatisfied with this decision, it was reasonable for her to request a review. If she remained unhappy following the review, there is a statutory right of appeal to the county court. It is reasonable for Ms X to use this right.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it was reasonable for her to request a review and, if dissatisfied with the outcome, to use her right of appeal to the county court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings