London Borough of Redbridge (24 014 788)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 04 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Miss X complained that delays by the Council when it was dealing with her homelessness application led to her incurring court costs. There was fault by the Council. The Council has agreed to pay the courts costs to remedy the injustice caused by its delay.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complains the Council delayed dealing with a homelessness application. Miss X says that the delay led to her incurring court costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
  2. If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered evidence provided by Miss X and the Council as well as relevant law, policy and guidance.
  2. Miss X and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Miss X lived in a property under a licence agreement. In response to my enquiries, the Council has agreed that the housing service should have helped Miss X to find alternative accommodation sooner rather than advising her to remain in occupancy. Miss X says that this meant she incurred court costs of £5589.
  2. The Council has said as it is reasonable to suggest it could have attempted to avoid court proceedings by acting sooner and so agrees to reimburse Miss X’s court costs. This is fault and reimbursing the court costs remedies the financial injustice to Miss X.

Back to top

Action

  1. Within one month of the date of the decision on this complaint the Council should:
    • Pay Miss X £5589.
  2. The Council should provide us with evidence it has complied with the above actions.

Back to top

Decision

  1. I have completed my investigation and I find fault causing injustice. The Council has agreed actions to remedy injustice.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings