London Borough of Enfield (24 004 429)
Category : Housing > Homelessness
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 11 Aug 2024
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to discharge its homelessness duty because Ms X has appealed to the county court. We cannot investigate where a person has sought a court remedy.
The complaint
- Ms X complained about the Council’s decision to end its homelessness duty when she refused an offer of private sector accommodation outside its area.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The courts have said that where someone has sought a remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, we cannot investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Where a council ends a homelessness duty the applicant has the right to ask for a review of the decision, which Ms X did. The Council upheld its original decision on review. Ms X then had the right to appeal to the county court on a point of law, and she is exercising that right.
- The courts have said we cannot investigate when someone has started court action. Therefore, we will not consider this complaint further.
Final decision
- We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint because she has appealed to the court.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman