Manchester City Council (24 003 653)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the support the Council provides its homeless community. That is because the concerns raised would be better addressed to her local councillor or MP.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the support the Council provides its homeless community. She said it does not have enough accommodation; that it has installed fencing to prevent rough sleeping outside the Town Hall; and that its Homeless Service is not fit for purpose. She said it has placed people in unaffordable properties; and that others have been evicted from tenancies without a reason, resulting in them becoming homeless again.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council supports its homeless community. That is because Miss X has not suffered a significant personal injustice as a direct action of the Council. The matters she is raising are part of a wider community campaign to improve services for homeless people. These concerns are better addressed through her local councillor or MP, rather than the Ombudsman. We would not be able to achieve the outcome she wants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the concerns raised would be better addressed to her local councillor or MP.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings