Bristol City Council (23 013 991)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with temporary accommodation after the Miss X became homeless. This us because she could have reasonably asked for a review. Further investigation into the decision to suspend her from the housing register would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains that the Council failed to act and arrange her accommodation when she became homeless and that it suspended her from the housing register. Miss X says the Council are not taking into account her health issues.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. People who are in temporary accommodation can ask for a suitability review if they think the accommodation is unsuitable. This is a formal process which is different to the complaints procedure.
  2. I will not investigate Miss X’s complaint with how the Council dealt with finding her temporary accommodation when she became homeless. The Council offered Miss X temporary accommodation on more than one occasion, but she considered it to be unsuitable because it would not accommodate her dogs. It would have been reasonable for her to have requested a review of the accommodation offered at the time.
  3. Miss X is now in temporary accommodation and on the housing register. She complains that the Council suspended her from the housing register for a period, the Council says this was due to it wating for information from Miss X about inheritance she may receive. I will not investigate this element of Miss X’s complaint because her suspension has been lifted with no detriment to her banding or application date. Further investigation would therefore not achieve a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss’s complaint because it was reasonable for her to ask for a review and because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings