London Borough of Ealing (23 012 337)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 May 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the suitability of Council’s offer of interim and temporary accommodation to Mr X in 2020. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council placing him in bed and breakfast accommodation for 14 weeks after he was stabbed and became homeless in 2019. He also says he was then placed in a hostel for 4 months in 2020 which he says was unsuitable due to having stairs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says he was stabbed in 2019 and lost his rented home shortly afterwards. He was offered interim accommodation in bed and breakfast which he was resident in for 14 weeks. In January 2020 Mr X was moved to a hostel following acceptance of the main housing duty. He says the accommodation was unsuitable due to his injuries and it having stairs.
  2. In December 2020 he was offered his current private rented temporary accommodation which he says is also unsuitable. The Council says that he was advised about his right to have a review of suitability in 2020 but that he did not pursue this at the time.
  3. Mr X has a current housing application and the Council says it is undertaking a medical review of information he has provided. If this does not change his priority he could ask the Council for a review of his application under s.166A of the Housing Act 1996. We would expect him to pursue this remedy.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the suitability of Council’s offer of interim and temporary accommodation to Mr X in 2020. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings