Leeds City Council (23 010 869)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Nov 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of Miss X’s housing application. It was reasonable for her to ask the Council to review the decision.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council’s decision not to give her housing application higher medical priority due to the effect on her mental health of being homeless.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X presented as homeless to the Council in 2023 and is currently assessed as Band A which is the banding awarded to homeless applicants in temporary accommodation. She says living in these circumstances has affected her mental health and applied for a medical assessment because she believes she should be in band A+ which is reserved for applicants with cumulative medical needs.
  2. The Council decided that she was in the correct banding for her circumstances and informed her that she was entitled to a statutory review of the decision. Instead, Miss X made a formal complaint and sought to have her case put through the complaints procedure. The Council says this is not an appropriate use of the procedure and that where an appeal or review is available as a remedy this must be pursued.
  3. Miss X has since asked for a review under s. 166 A(9)(c) of the Housing Act 1996 and the Council says this will be completed by December.
  4. We will not investigate a complaint where there is aright to a statutory review available and it is reasonable for the complainant to use this remedy.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of Miss X’s housing application. It was reasonable for her to ask the Council to review the decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings