Summary: There is no fault in how the Council offered Ms X a homeless assessment.

The complaint

1. Ms X complains that the Council failed to provide her the right help when she had to leave her home.
2. As a result, Ms X says she has had to live in unaffordable hotel accommodation since April 2020.

Back to top

What I have investigated

3. Ms X complains about matters dating back to 2017. However, I have not investigated things that happened before April 2021.
4. This is because we cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
5. There is no reason Ms X could not have complained about the earlier issues sooner and so there is no reason to exercise discretion to investigate them now.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

6. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused an injustice, we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
7. If we are satisfied with a council’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

8. I considered the complaint and the information Ms X provided.
9. I made written enquiries of the Council and considered its response along with relevant law and guidance.
10. Ms X and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments received before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

11. Ms X sent an email to the Council in April 2021 asking for help with her housing.
12. The Council sent Ms X a “self-referral form” which she completed and returned.
13. The Council offered Ms X a telephone assessment in early May.
14. Ms X replied to ask for a face-to-face meeting. The Council explained that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, its staff were working from home and could not meet in person. It offered to arrange a video call instead.
15. Ms X never responded to this offer. The Council send two further emails, to which Ms X did not reply.
16. Ms X then complained to the Council in July.

My findings

17. The Council made efforts to engage with Ms X to complete its assessment which she did not take up. This is her choice.
18. I understand her wish to have an in-person meeting. However, the Council followed the COVID-19 guidelines in place at the time by asking its officers to work from home.
19. The Council attempted to reach a compromise by offering Ms X a video call instead. Ms X did not respond to the Council’s emails about this. The Council is not at fault.

Back to top

Final decision

20. I have completed my investigation. The Council is not at fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman