London Borough of Redbridge (21 001 462)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the complainant’s homelessness application because the matters have been addressed in court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, complains the Council has treated him badly and has not provided him with social housing. He wants the Council to provide him with a permanent home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read the complaint and the Council’s responses. I considered some of the court decisions and comments Mr X made in reply to a draft of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

What happened

  1. Mr X made a homelessness application in 2016. The Council accepted the application but then discharged its duty because it said Mr X had refused a reasonable offer of accommodation. There have been court cases about the Council’s decisions and the final outcome, as decided in court, was that the Council owed no housing duty to Mr X. In 2019, the court ordered Mr X to pay the Council’s costs. Mr X agrees there has been court action but says the court has not made a final decision about the homelessness application and has not decided the Council does not owe him a housing duty.
  2. Since 2018 the Council has, at various times, invited Mr X to submit a new homelessness application or make an application to the housing register. The Council says Mr X has not made any new applications. Mr X says the Council has not invited him to make a new application.

Assessment

  1. The law says we cannot investigate any matter that has been considered in court. The issues relating to Mr X’s homelessness application have been considered in court so I cannot start an investigation. This restriction applies as soon as legal action starts and applies even though Mr X says the court has not yet made a final decision about the homelessness application.
  2. Mr X does not have an open homelessness or housing application so the Council has no duty to provide him with social housing. Mr X can submit a homelessness application or a housing application but it would be for the Council, not us, to determine the outcome. Mr X says the Council did not invite him to make a new application but he is aware he can make an application.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I cannot start an investigation because the matters have been considered in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings