London Borough of Southwark (19 006 265)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 30 Oct 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his housing application. The Ombudsman has discontinued his investigation. This is because the matter is still ongoing.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his housing application. Mr X says he and his family were living in statutory overcrowded housing. He complains the Council:
  • Took over a year to process his application.
  • Incorrectly downgraded his priority to band 4.
  • Incorrectly applied its housing application policy.

Mr X is represented by Ms A.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I spoke with Ms A and considered the information she provided.
  2. I sent a draft decision to Ms A and the Council for their comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X does not speak English as his first language.
  2. In April 2018, Mr X applied to join the Council’s housing register. The Council decided Mr X did not meet the local connection criteria.
  3. In May 2018, Mr X the Council to review the decision. The Council decided to reopen his application.
  4. Between July 2018 and March 2019, the Council said it asked Mr X to provide further information. The Council said while Mr X did provide some information, he did not provide all the information requested. The Council also said there was delay in Mr X providing the information he did. Mr X said he responded to the Council without delay.
  5. In April 2019, the Council wrote to Mr X with its decision. It said the key facts provided by Mr X in support of his application were not true or were factually inaccurate. The Council determined Mr X had acted to gain an unfair advantage on the Council’s housing waiting list. The Council placed Mr X’s application in priority band 4.
  6. Mr X made a complaint about the Council’s handling of his application in October 2018. The Council responded to this complaint in November 2018. Mr X escalated his complaint to stage two in March 2019 and the Council responded in May 2019.
  7. In September 2019, Mr X advised the Ombudsman he was getting legal advice and asked us to pause our investigation.
  8. In October 2019, Mr X confirmed he was still pursuing the matter legally.

Analysis

  1. Mr X has confirmed he is still pursuing this matter with the Council with his legal team. Therefore, the matter is still ongoing. It is difficult to conduct an effective investigation when a matter has not ended.
  2. Further, the Ombudsman cannot keep the complaint open while Mr X continues to pursue the matter.
  3. Therefore, I will discontinue my investigation. Mr X can return to the Ombudsman if he remains dissatisfied once the matter has concluded.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation. This is because the matter is still ongoing.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings