Leeds City Council (19 010 243)

Category : Housing > Council house sales and leaseholders

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Nov 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Miss Q’s Right to Buy application. This is because she may go to court to settle her dispute over the position of her boundary.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I have called Miss Q, complained about Leeds City Council’s handling of her Right to Buy (RTB) application. She said they cannot agree where the boundary for her property is.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Miss Q provided. I discussed the complaint and a draft of this decision with Miss Q.

Back to top

What I found

Background

  1. The Housing Act 1985 (the Act) sets out the RTB process.
  2. Section 181 of the Act enables a tenant to take a RTB dispute to the County Court. The County Court may decide any dispute about the RTB, except for disputes over the valuation of the property.

What happened

  1. Miss Q made a RTB application for her council house in 2017. She said there had been a boundary issue at the back of her property, but that had been resolved. However, more recently, the Council moved her neighbour’s fence at the front of her property. Miss Q believes the boundary is now in the wrong place. The Council does not agree. Miss Q wants to establish where the boundary is and complete the purchase of her council house without further delay.

Assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint.
  2. Miss Q and the Council cannot agree where the boundary for her property is. This is a dispute that can be decided by the County Court. It is not our role to decide where the boundary should be. So I think it would be reasonable for Miss Q to go to the County Court to establish where the boundary is.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Q’s complaint. This is because she may go to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings