Eastleigh Borough Council (25 022 025)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about housing allocations. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council has not correctly assessed his family’s needs when considering his application for a larger property.
  2. He says his child needs a bedroom of their own due to their additional needs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X applied to the Council for a property with a separate bedroom for his child with special needs.
  2. Mr X’s application explained the family’s needs and provided supporting evidence from two health professionals and the child’s education setting.
  3. The Council refused the application and a later review request. It said the supporting evidence did not specify a need for an extra bedroom.
  4. Mr X made a further application a few months later. This included further evidence because more professionals were involved.
  5. The Council then agreed to provide the family with an extra bedroom.
  6. The Council offered the family a suitable property a few weeks after the favourable decision. As Mr X’s application has now been accepted and he has moved into a larger property, I consider it is unlikely further investigation by the Ombudsman would lead to a different outcome or achieve anything more for
    Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings