Eastleigh Borough Council (25 021 434)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to amend its original decision on Mr X’s relative’s application to join the Housing Register. This is because there is no evidence of a significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains, on behalf of his relative Mrs Y, about the Council’s decision to amend its original decision. This has left Mrs Y no longer eligible to bid for properties.
  2. Mr X says this created a false expectation and has adversely affected Mrs Y’s mental and physical health. Mr X wants the Council to reinstate its original decision so that Mrs Y qualifies to join the Housing Register.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council initially approved the application in August 2025, allowing them to bid for properties. The decision was later reversed in October 2025, which they were told resulted from an error by an undergraduate placement
  2. The Council accepts there was an error in earlier communication but following review, it upheld that the application is not eligible under its allocations scheme.
  3. We will not investigate. Although the Council’s error caused distress and raised expectations, there is no evidence the complainant lost a realistic opportunity to secure housing, as the application would not have qualified in any event. The injustice is therefore not significant.
  4. I note the Council has advised Mrs Y she can submit a new application if her circumstances change or apply to another authority where eligibility criteria may be met.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint as there is no evidence of a significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings