London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (25 011 800)
Category : Housing > Allocations
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 16 Feb 2026
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the suitability of Mr X’s accommodation as it is late and there are no good reasons to consider it now.
The complaint
- Mr X complained that the Council:
- Wrongly offered a property to Mr X and his family which did not meet their health needs as it did not have a toilet on the ground floor.
- Wrongly refused Mr X’s disabled facilities grant application to install a downstairs toilet.
- Mr X says that as a result he and his family have been caused significant distress and anxiety as they are living in accommodation that does not meet their needs.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- In early 2023, Mr X accepted the tenancy of a property offered by the Council. Before accepting the tenancy Mr X told the Council his family required a downstairs toilet to meet their health needs. The Council assessed whether Mr X and his family were eligible for disabled facilities grant to fund the installation of a downstairs toilet. The Council considered the level of Mr X and his family’s income meant they were not eligible for a disabled facilities grant.
- Mr X raised his concerns about his accommodation with his local councillor. In early 2024, the councillor told Mr X how he could make a complaint to the Council. Mr X made a complaint to the Council in September 2024 which it considered through its two stage complaints procedure. He then made a complaint to the Ombudsman in September 2025.
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint as it is late. We are mindful that the Council responded to Mr X’s stage two complaint in June 2025. But the timescale for a complaint to us runs from when a person is first aware of their complaint. It is not from when they complain to the Council and receive the final response to their complaint. Mr X was aware in early 2023 of his concerns about the suitability of his property. Emails between the Council and Mr X’s councillor from early 2024 show Mr X would have been aware of the Council’s decision to refuse a disabled facilities grant at that time, if not earlier. So Mr X’s complaint is late and it is reasonable to expect him to have made a complaint to us before now. There are no good reasons to investigate the complaint now.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint as it is late and there are no good reasons to investigate the complaint now.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman