Coventry City Council (25 007 810)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to allow Mrs X to join its housing register as it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has refused to accept her on to its housing register. Mrs X seeks to return to the Council area, to be near family for support as she has ill health issues and is recently bereaved. Mrs X does not feel the Council has fully taken account of this and that it should accept her on to its register due to her local connection. Mrs X says she has been caused stress by this which is making her health worse.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s ‘Homefinder’ policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council assessed Mrs X’s application to join its housing register with reference to its Homefinder policy. It refused Mrs X’s application as it considers she is adequately housed in her current home, as no evidence has been provided to indicate the property is making Mrs X’s ill health worse. The Council acknowledged that Mrs X could obtain support from family if she lived locally but that Mrs X could obtain support in her current home, as she lives in an assisted living property and/or Mrs X could ask her local social services for help. The Council acknowledged that Mrs X does have a local connection, but this alone does not entitle her join its housing register. In its review decision letter, the Council also explained how it had considered its public sector equality duty in assessing Mrs X’s application.
  2. I recognise that Mrs X is unhappy about the Council’s decision, but we could only challenge it if there was evidence of fault in the way it was reached. I have considered the Council’s review decision, and I have referred to the Council’s ‘Homefinder’ policy; I have not seen evidence of such fault. There are not therefore grounds for us to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings