North Yorkshire Council (25 007 516)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of Mrs X’s housing application. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has not given her housing application enough priority. She says this has caused her anxiety and she remains in housing unsuited to her family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the Council.
  2. I considered the Council’s Housing Allocations Policy.
  3. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council gave Mrs X’s housing application silver priority under its housing allocations policy. Mrs X asked for a review, so an organisation acting for the Council reviewed the decision.
  2. The review considered information Mrs X had provided about her circumstances, including her illness. It upheld the award of silver priority and said it was not persuaded to give higher priority.
  3. Although Mrs X is unhappy with the decision, we will not investigate. The Council took account of the relevant information and its allocations policy when making its decision.
  4. We are not an appeal body. It is not our role to say what decision a Council should make. Unless there is fault in the decision-making process, we cannot comment on the decision reached. The law says councils must make decisions in line with their published allocations scheme. The evidence suggests the Council reached its decision properly.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings