Rochford District Council (25 007 088)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s advice to Miss X regarding her eligibility to join its housing register as it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council has wrongly told her that she will not be eligible to join its housing register as she says she has lived in the area since she was a child. Miss X says this is impacting on her mental and physical health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant. I have considered the Council’s housing allocations policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s housing allocations policy explains that it will only accept an applicant to its housing register if they have a local connection to the Council’s district. To be classed as having a local connection, an applicant must have lived in the Council district continuously for the preceding five years or be aged over 55, require sheltered accommodation and have a close family member that has lived in the district for the five years.
  2. The policy details categories of applicants where an exception is made to the local connection requirement.
  3. I recognise that Miss X says she has lived in the area since being a child but in saying this, I believe Miss X is referring to having lived in the Essex area. As the Council’s policy indicates, Miss X would have had to have lived in its specific district area for the last five years to have the local connection needed to join its register. Miss X has not provided information to us that would indicate she would qualify on the second local connection ground or that her circumstances might mean she would qualify as an exemption to the local connection requirement.
  4. As such, it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council, and we will not therefore investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings