North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (25 006 695)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how it has applied its process to her housing register bid. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has wrongly recorded that she rejected an offer of housing. She says the Council is wrong to take the fact it was unable to reach her as a refusal and asked that it amend its records.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X bid on a property on the Council’s property register. When the Council called to offer the property to her, she did not answer.
  2. The Council left a voicemail message and an email for Ms X. The email stated the Council wished to discuss an offer of accommodation with her. It also explained if she did not call back by a certain time the next day, the Council would move onto the next applicant.
  3. The Council called Ms X again the next day, but when it was unable to reach her, it recorded this as a rejection.
  4. Ms X complained she had not rejected the property. In its complaint response, the Council explained this is standard practice where they are unable to reach an applicant. It also explained there is a need for this due to the huge demand for housing.
  5. The Council took steps to contact Ms X and gave a warning of what would happen if Ms X did not respond.
  6. Ms X is still on the property register and is not prevented from bidding again.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings