Epping Forest District Council (25 005 708)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s assessment of her housing application. She says she was awarded Band C for her son’s medical needs but believes that she should be placed in a higher banding because he is not managing sharing even though he has been recommended for a separate bedroom.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s review of her case. I have also considered the Council’s Housing Allocations policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X says she applied for a review of her housing application on medical grounds. She says her husband and her son have needs which require her family to be moved urgently. The Council carried out a medial assessment and awarded Band C moderate needs with ground floor and a separate bedroom for her son. Her husband did not meet the threshold for medical priority.
  2. Mrs X says she should be awarded at least Band B urgent priority because her son needs to be moved quickly due to safety issues with window and door locks in her home. The medical assessment recommended that locks be fitted.
  3. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether someone disagrees with the decision the organisation made.
  4. I have seen no evidence of fault which would suggest that Mrs X should be placed in a higher banding. The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council’s assessment of a housing application/ a housing applicant’s priority if it has carried this out in line with its published allocations scheme. We recognise that the demand for social housing far outstrips the supply of properties in many areas.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings