Ashford Borough Council (25 003 988)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has managed Miss X’s housing application. This is because there is not significant enough injustice.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council is taking too long to move her and her family to a larger property. Miss X says this means her family is living in overcrowded conditions. She wants the Council to move them as quickly as possible.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Every local housing authority must publish an allocations scheme that sets out how it prioritises applicants, and its procedures for allocating housing. All allocations must be made in strict accordance with the published scheme. (Housing Act 1996, section 166A(1) & (14))
  2. Miss X joined the Council’s housing register in 2019. The Council assesses Miss X’s housing application as priority band B. This is the second highest priority band under the Council’s allocations scheme.
  3. I have considered how the Council has assessed Miss X’s application against its allocations scheme. Miss X’s application is prioritised as band B. I can see no grounds for the Council to prioritise Miss X as band A. I consider that Miss X is in the highest priority band that she could be awarded by the Council. Therefore the Council’s handling of Miss X’s application is unlikely to have caused significant injustice.
  4. I recognise that Miss X wants to move as soon as possible. However, I also recognise the demand for social housing far outstrips the supply of properties in many areas. The Council has no obligation to rehouse Miss X within a specific timescale.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. This is because any injustice from the Council’s handling of the application is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings