London Borough of Enfield (25 003 497)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 07 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council closing Mr X’s housing register application. The Council agreed to apologise and make a symbolic payment of £300 to Mr X which is an appropriate remedy so an investigation would not be proportionate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that the Council:
  • Wrongly closed his housing register and did not notify him of the decision.
  • Delayed in dealing with his complaint at stage two of the complaints procedure.
  1. Mr X says that the Council’s actions caused significant distress to him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X has been on the Council’s housing register for a number of years. On 7 November 2024, the Council closed his housing register application. It reopened the application on 7 March 2025.
  2. If we were to investigate Mr X’s complaint it is likely we would find fault causing injustice to him. In response to Mr X’s complaint, the Council acknowledged it wrongly closed Mr X’s housing application between 7 November 2024 and 7 March 2025. The closure caused distress to Mr X and some uncertainty as to whether he missed an offer during this time. The Council also took two months longer than its target timescale to respond to Mr X’s complaint at stage two of its complaints process. The time taken put Mr X to avoidable time and trouble when pursuing his complaint.
  3. We invited the Council to apologise to Mr X and make a symbolic payment of £300 to acknowledge the distress and avoidable time and trouble caused to him.

Back to top

Agreed Action

  1. The Council agreed to resolve Mr X’s complaint by apologising to him and making a symbolic payment of £300 to acknowledge the distress and avoidable time and trouble caused. The Council will take this action within one month of this final decision.
  2. As the Council agreed to our proposed remedy, we will not investigate this complaint as it would not be proportionate to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. The Council agreed to provide an appropriate remedy so it would not be proportionate to investigate the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings