London Borough of Ealing (25 000 047)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to discharge Miss X from its main housing duty. This is because Miss X has a right to a review of the Council’s decision, and it would be reasonable for her to use it.

The complaint

  1. Miss S complained on Miss X’s behalf that the Council wrongly discharged her from its housing duty after she refused its offer of accommodation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss S complained on her mother Miss X’s behalf about the Council’s decision to discharge Miss X from its housing duty when she declined to accept its offer of accommodation.
  2. The Council said the accommodation offered was suitable for Miss X and her reasons for refusing its offer were not valid. The Council did not uphold the complaint and told Miss S that Miss X had a right to review of the decision to discharge her from its main housing duty.
  3. The Ombudsman will not usually exercise discretion to investigate a complaint where the complainant has a right to review and it would be reasonable for the complainant to use it. In this case, Miss X has been made aware that she can ask for a review of the Council’s decision, it is open to her to make use of this option.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has a right to a review of the Council’s decision and it would be reasonable for her to use it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings