Southend-on-Sea City Council (24 023 157)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council decided Ms X did not qualify to join the housing register. Ms X had a right to ask for a review of the Council’s decision which she could have used. It is unlikely we would find fault if we investigated.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained that the Council:
      1. decided she did not qualify to join the housing register;
      2. failed to tell her about her right of review
      3. told her it was too late to ask for a review when she asked for one.
  2. Ms X says she needs to move to be nearer her family to access support.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X applied to join the Council’s housing register for social housing. She said she needed to move to be nearer family to access support with day to day tasks.
  2. The Council wrote to Ms X in November 2024 with its decision. It said she did not qualify because she did not have any housing need. It said the location of her family was not far enough away for her to need to move to access support.
  3. The Council’s decision explained how it considered Ms X’s evidence. It is unlikely we would find fault with how the Council made this decision.
  4. The decision said Ms X could ask for a review within 21 days. Ms X did not ask for a review of the decision within 21 days. There is no reason she could not have done so. The Council told Ms X she could submit new evidence and it would consider it. It is open to her to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because Ms X could have used her right of review.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings