Westminster City Council (24 021 148)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to award Mr X medical priority for housing. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has refused to allow him to move property on medical grounds. He says it has ignored the information he provided.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X applied to move property on medical grounds. He told the Council his current property was making his health worse and he provided supporting information.
  2. On review the Council maintained it would not rehouse Mr X on medical grounds. It considered a property survey report and Mr X’s medical information and decided the property was not affecting his health.
  3. The Council’s policy is to rehouse on medical grounds where the housing situation seriously affects a person’s health and the property cannot be adapted to meet needs. The Council considered the information provided and decided Mr X’s housing was not affecting his health. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision making to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings