Folkestone & Hythe District Council (24 018 717)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his homelessness application. He has a right of review about the suitability of the accommodation offered and it is reasonable for him to use it. If he is dissatisfied with the outcome of the review, he can appeal to the county court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his homelessness application. He says the Council has failed to provide support and forced him to move to unsuitable accommodation. He wants the Council to provide him with suitable social housing and compensate him for the distress caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X approached the Council when he became at risk of homelessness. The Council accepted it had a duty to provide support to prevent him from becoming homeless.
  2. It made him an offer of accommodation in April 2025. In its offer letter it said it was satisfied the accommodation was suitable for him and met his housing needs. It said if he did not agree the accommodation offered was suitable, he could request a review of the decision. It advised him how to submit a review and provided information about the review process.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. Mr X has a statutory right of review about the accommodation offered. If he does not agree the accommodation offered is suitable, it is reasonable for him to request a review. If he is dissatisfied with the outcome of the review, he will have a right of appeal to the courts.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has a statutory right of review about the accommodation offered and it is reasonable for him to use it. If he remains dissatisfied following the review, he will have a right of appeal to the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings