London Borough of Islington (24 016 235)
Category : Housing > Allocations
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 30 Mar 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision-making relating to Ms X’s request for a housing transfer. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons why it could not have been made sooner.
The complaint
- Ms X said the Council wrongly interpreted its housing allocations policy when it decided she was not due management or welfare points, following an incident at her home. Ms X said she cannot return home, and the Council’s decision has prevented her from bidding for an appropriate house that suits her needs. Ms X wants the Council to provide her a house in line with her needs.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- In March 2023, Ms X told the Council she had left her home, because she had experienced a violent incident there and felt unsafe. The Council and Ms X corresponded about this matter and the Council gave Ms X advice relating to homelessness. Ms X subsequently complained to the Council. In December 2024, she complained to us.
- We will not investigate this matter. Although the Council acknowledged a significant delay in dealing with Ms X’s complaint (around five months), I am not satisfied that fully explains the long delay in Ms X’s complaint being submitted to us in good time.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint, because it is late and I have not seen good reasons for the delay, in her making her complaint to us, to exercise discretion to consider it now.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman