Northumberland County Council (24 004 922)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s allocation of housing to a homeless applicant in 2023. It was reasonable for Miss X to ask for a review of suitability when the property was offered.

The complaint

  1. Miss X’s representative complained about her being allocated a property which she believes is unsuitable due to its location away from relatives who provide support.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X was on the Council’s housing register and was offered a tenancy in December 2023. She accepted the offer but in January 2024 her representative made a formal complaint to the Council about the suitability of the offer due to its location being distant from her in order to provide support. The Council was restricted in what information it could divulge to the representative because it had not received consent from the tenant to do so.
  2. In June Miss X’s representative made a complaint to us and in July provided Miss X’s signed consent.
  3. Under the provisions of the Housing Act 1996 and government guidance if someone is made an offer of accommodation and they believe it is unsuitable they can ask for a statutory review under s.202. Miss X did not ask for a review following her accepting the tenancy and she had not given consent for a review to be undertaken by the time the Council completed its complaints process.
  4. It was reasonable for Miss X to ask for a review if she believed the offer of accommodation was not suitable for her needs following the Council’s offer.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s allocation of housing to a homeless applicant in 2023. It was reasonable for Miss X to ask for a review of suitability when the property was offered.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings