London Borough of Waltham Forest (23 000 472)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jul 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s assessment of her housing application. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has not dealt with her urgent medical need for accommodation. She says it has ignored the impact on her health.
  2. Ms X would like the Council to award her higher priority and offer her accommodation directly.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Ms X which includes the Council’s comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X is on the Council’s housing waiting list as she is overcrowded. She is living in a one-bedroom property with her young child. She also suffers medical issues that make the sharing of the bedroom difficult for her.
  2. Ms X complains about the Council not awarding her any medical priority to her housing application to bump up her up the waiting list. (The Council told her in May that she was number 86 in line for a two-bedroom first floor flat).
  3. The Council has admitted some fault in not responding to Ms X’s request for a review of its medical advisor decision in March 2023.
  4. In April, after receiving Ms X’s complaint, the Council arranged to review her medical evidence from the hospital and her GP. But it confirmed the original decision that she was not entitled to medical priority. So, it cannot award her higher priority or offer accommodation directly as that would not be in line with its Housing Allocations Policy.
  5. The Council’s allocation scheme says an applicant will be placed in band three if they are overcrowded by one bedroom. This is the situation Ms X finds herself in. I understand Ms X is disappointed with the decision. But, based on the information available, it is unlikely we would find fault in the way the Council reached its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision not to award medical priority.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings