Wychavon District Council (21 003 348)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms Z’s complaint about the Council’s failure to let her apply for a two-bedroom property. This is because there is no evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Ms Z says the Council has refused to allocate her a two bedroomed property despite providing medical evidence to show her need for this.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A (6))
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the Ms Z and the Council, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms Z says her mental health needs mean she needs a two-bedroom property as she needs someone to stay with her overnight. The medical report Ms Z provided says there are times when she would benefit from family support, and ‘from time to time’ to have someone stay overnight.
  2. The Council’s allocations policy says a single person can normally only be allocated one bedroom. In this instance, the Council said it would not allocate her a two bedroomed property as she does not have a live-in carer. I recognise Ms Z might disagree with the Council’s decision, but it has considered having someone to stay overnight ‘from time to time’ is not enough to justify a departure from its policy. We cannot question the Council’s decision without evidence of fault in the way it made it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part as it considered Ms Z’s medical circumstances.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings