Decision search
Your search has 51109 results
-
London Borough of Waltham Forest (23 017 194)
Statement Not upheld Allocations 22-Sep-2024
Summary: Miss X complained about the Council’s failure to rehouse her after her son had a serious injury. We have not found the Council to be at fault. It assessed Miss X’s transfer request in line with its published allocations policy. The delay in rehousing her was due a shortage of suitable three-bedroomed properties in the area.
-
Birmingham City Council (23 017 492)
Statement Upheld Refuse and recycling 22-Sep-2024
Summary: Mr X complained the Council has repeatedly failed to collect his recycling on the scheduled days or in a timely manner when collections are missed. And that the Council has failed to properly investigate his complaints or address his concerns. The Council repeated failure to collect Mr X’s recycling as scheduled is fault, as was the failure to properly consider and respond to his complaints. These faults have caused Mr X and injustice.
-
Statement Upheld Allocations 22-Sep-2024
Summary: We found fault on Mrs K’s complaint about the Council failing to allow her to bid for two-bedroom properties which left her in a property which does not meet her needs. It failed to show it properly considered her evidence when reaching its decision. The agreed action remedies the injustice caused.
-
Devon County Council (24 000 238)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 22-Sep-2024
Summary: Miss X complained the Council delayed completing her son, Y’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment in line with statutory timescales. The Council was at fault. It delayed deciding whether to issue Y with an EHC Plan within the statutory timescale, caused by a seven week delay in obtaining Educational Psychologist advice. It then further delayed issuing Y’s final EHC Plan by 27 weeks after it received the EP advice. This caused Miss X distress, uncertainty and delayed her right of appeal to the SEND tribunal. The Council agreed to make a payment to acknowledge this injustice and explain what action it is taking to reduce the backlogs in the EHC needs assessment process.
-
Elmbridge Borough Council (24 000 370)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 22-Sep-2024
Summary: Mrs B complained that the Council had failed to take enforcement action against development next door to her property and failed to notice that the certificates of ownership submitted with the original applications were wrong and the building work had encroached on her land. We have not found fault with the actions of the Council.
-
Brighton & Hove City Council (24 001 447)
Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 22-Sep-2024
Summary: Mrs X complains that the Council failed to comply with the agreed action in the Ombudsman’s final decision for her previous complaint to source a domestic support provider for her. The Council took sufficient action to source a domestic support provider for Mrs X. But the Council is at a fault as it failed to consider if it needed to make reasonable adjustments for Mrs X to complete the paperwork for direct payments. This fault did not cause significant injustice to Mrs X.
-
Garsewednack Care Home Limited (24 001 521)
Statement Not upheld Residential care 22-Sep-2024
Summary: Mrs Y complained about the care her friend, the late Mrs X, received while in a care home and the conduct of the manager. We will not continue with our investigation. This is because any further investigation by us would be unlikely to add anything to the care provider’s response to Mrs Y’s complaint.
-
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 002 069)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 22-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to the complainant’s enquiries. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council responded to the planning enquiries. We do not consider the injustice caused by Officer’s comments is so significant that it warrants an investigation and we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.
-
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (24 002 278)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 22-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with a planning application and delays in responding to the complaint. The Council refused the planning application, so we do not consider Mr X suffered a significant personal injustice on this point. The application was approved by the Planning Inspectorate which is outside our jurisdiction. Also, we do not consider the complainant suffered a significant personal injustice because of the Council’s delay in responding to his complaint.
-
Bristol City Council (24 004 720)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 22-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Miss X’s housing situation. The complaint is late and there are no grounds for us to now consider it.