Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52298 results

  • Nottingham City Council (24 016 791)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s actions in its child protection involvement with her family because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so.

  • Sevenoaks District Council (24 017 135)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

  • Westminster City Council (24 017 160)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council would not let him enrol onto adult education courses. This is because the law prevents us from investigating complaints about adult education.

  • Suffolk County Council (24 008 951)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s actions in relation to her child, Y’s, Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan. The Council was at fault. It did not send Mrs X a draft amended EHC Plan when it became aware she did not have it. It also delayed issuing a final EHC Plan. This caused Mrs X frustration and delayed her right of appeal to SEND Tribunal. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mrs X and pay her £300 for the injustice it caused her.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (24 009 311)

    Statement Not upheld Allocations 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: Miss X complained about the time she has been waiting to be offered a new property. We find no fault in the Council’s actions or its decision making.

  • Lichfield District Council (24 010 346)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Health and safety 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s actions following a report of rats coming from her property. This is because the investigation resulted in the Council issuing her a legal notice, which it is reasonable for her to appeal at the Magistrates’ Court.

  • Warwickshire County Council (24 011 360)

    Statement Upheld Charging 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council failed to tell her she would be charged for the care services she received. This is because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Ms X.

  • Staffordshire County Council (24 013 029)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: We have upheld this complaint because the Council delayed arranging the education provision detailed in a child’s Education Health and Care Plan. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by offering to make a suitable payment to the complainant to remedy the injustice this caused.

  • Fylde Borough Council (24 013 409)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 12-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of matters relating to its failure to take enforcement action under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and 1987 or to issue a Community Protection Notice under the Anti-Social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014. This is because the complaint is a late complaint and so falls outside our jurisdiction due to the passage of time and because an investigation will not lead to the outcomes Mr X seeks.

  • Warwickshire County Council (24 018 167)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 11-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delays in meeting the agreements of a claim about the effects of a highway scheme on private property. This is a private matter which was best determined by insurers or the courts if no agreement could be made. Most of the events took place more than 12 months before the complaint was submitted to us and we will not consider them further.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings