Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (22 004 144a)

Category : Health > Education, health and care plans

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Jul 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about how Oxfordshire County Council assessed the special educational needs of her daughter. Mrs X has appealed to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X says Oxfordshire County Council (the Council) did not correctly record her daughter’s (Y) special educational needs in the Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. SEND is a tribunal that considers special educational needs. (The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (‘SEND’)).
  4. A child with special educational needs may have an EHC plan. This sets out the child’s needs and what arrangements should be made to meet them. The EHC plan is set out in sections. We cannot direct changes to the sections about education or name a different school. Only the SEND Tribunal can do this.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Mrs X’s information and spoken to her on the phone.
  2. Mrs X had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments received before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. In March 2021, an Occupational Therapist for a local NHS Trust assessed Y at her school as part of the EHC needs assessment.
  2. The Council issued Y’s EHC plan in March 2021, before the Occupational Therapist submitted their report to the Council.
  3. In May 2021, the Council amended Y’s EHC plan to include the Occupational Therapist’s report.
  4. Mrs X appealed to the SEND Tribunal about the descriptions of Y’s special educational needs.
  5. In June 2022, the SEND Tribunal made many recommendations to the Council to amend Y’s EHC plan.
  6. I will not investigate this complaint because it is outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. Mrs X has appealed to the SEND Tribunal about Y’s special education needs.
  7. Mrs X says the Occupational Therapist’s assessment was flawed, which was part of the reason she appealed to the SEND Tribunal. Mrs X argued Y’s special educational needs were different than recorded in the EHC plan. The SEND Tribunal has already considered Mrs X’s arguments and recommended changes to the EHC plan. Therefore, I will not consider this complaint about the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about how the Council assessed Y’s special educational needs. Mrs X has appealed to the SEND Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings