London Borough of Bexley (25 026 859)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate most of Mr X’s complaint about damage caused to his property by Council contractors because it is reasonable to expect Mr X to take the matter to court to achieve the outcome he seeks. We will not investigate the Council’s complaint handling because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council:
      1. failed to accept damage caused to his property by Council contracted workers;
      2. erroneously directed Mr X to pursue a damage claim directly by the Council’s contractor; and
      3. failed to progress his complaint through its complaints process.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him frustration and time and trouble.
  3. Mr X wants the Council to reassess his claim and reimburse his costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended).
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Damage to property and liability

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. The role of the Ombudsman is to consider complaints of administrative fault. We cannot decide liability in complaints about damage to property, only the courts can do this.
  2. If Mr X believes the Council is responsible for the damage caused to his property, he can take the matter to court. It is reasonable to expect him to do so as it is the only way he can achieve the outcome he seeks.

Complaints handling

  1. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate most of Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to take the matter to court. We will not investigate the remainder because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings