Havant Borough Council (25 013 318)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s monitoring and response to reports of a contravention of a tree preservation order. A complaint about these matters is now late and there are no good reasons why it could not have been made to us sooner. Other parts of the complaint are premature, and it would be reasonable to allow the Council to consider them.

The complaint

  1. X complained the Council had failed to properly monitor, and respond, to what he said were contraventions of a tree preservation order (TPO). X said this he is concerned about the Council’s ability to protect the affected area.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the organisation knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the organisation of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), section 34(B)6)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. X said he provided evidence to the Council that there had been a breach of a TPO. He said the Council should be doing more to monitor and investigate alleged breach of TPO’s.
  2. The Council responded and gave reasons for why it did not see an investigation was necessary.
  3. We will not investigate X’s complaint about the Council’s actions at that point. The available evidence shows X was raising these issues with the Council in January 2024, and they did not make a complaint to us, until September 2025. This complaint is therefore late, and I have not seen any evidence of good reasons to exercise discretion to consider it now.
  4. X said he now had further evidence that demonstrates his case. Noting the restrictions in our powers at paragraph four and this relates to new information, now available to the Council, it would be reasonable to allow the Council an opportunity to consider it and reply. It is then open to X to come back to us after he gets the Council’s response to this, if he remains unhappy.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint because it is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to consider it. Other parts of his complaint are premature.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings