Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough Council (25 013 168)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to prune or remove a tree. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council’s tree is overhanging his garden. He asked the Council to prune or remove the tree because he cannot do so, but it refused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council says it will not prune or remove the tree because it goes against its policy, which says:
    • The Council will not normally conduct any tree works relating to garden overhang.
    • If the overhang is to a garden site inspection is not required.
  1. The Council considered the information Mr X provided but concluded there were no grounds to take action. It said Mr X can carry out tree work in his own garden and if he is not able to do so a tree surgeon can trim any overhanging branches on his behalf.
  2. We are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. The Council’s process in deciding not to prune the tree involved assessing the situation and applying its policy. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council made its decision to warrant an investigation. We realise Mr X disagrees with the decision, but this itself is not evidence of fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings