Transport for London (25 005 299)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a tree near the train network. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y has complained the Authority (TfL) has failed to properly maintain a tree which he says needs to be removed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y and the Authority and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. TfL says it has visited Mr Y’s home to discuss the tree he has complained about. It says that it has told Mr Y it does not own the tree and for work to be carried out on the tree the overhead power lines would need to be shut down. It says that this is not its role and the national rail operator needs to coordinate the shutdown of the overhead power lines with a date when other work is already being carried out on the railway to allow for the line to close. TfL has therefore referred Mr Y to the rail network operator, who also own the land the tree is on.
  2. As the tree is not either owned by or on the land of TfL and therefore TfL does not have responsibility for the tree, there is not enough evidence of fault in TfL’s lack of action to justify investigation. As there is not enough evidence of fault, we cannot justify investigating this issue and therefore we will not investigate it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y ’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings