North Somerset Council (25 003 151)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council refusing to take action to deal with overhanging tree branches. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process to warrant us investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained that trees owned by the council were overhanging into her garden. She was worried about the danger this caused her family. She was also unhappy that the Council had told her she could privately arrange to have the overhanging part of the trees cut back but she would have to pay. She wants the council to cut the trees back.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by Mrs X
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation has followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, even if someone disagrees with it.
  2. In response to Mrs X’s concerns, the Council inspected the trees and carried out a risk assessment in line with its policy. The assessment included consideration for the risk of harm to people and property. It gave a detailed explanation of why the Council would only partially prune the trees but agreed to reassess once the work was carried out.
  3. We recognise Mrs X disagrees with the Council’s decision. But it is not fault for a council to properly make a decision with which someone disagrees. The evidence shows the Council properly considered the risks posed by the overhanging branches and the Council’s decision not to cut the trees back is a matter of professional judgement. I have seen no evidence of fault in the way the decision was reached, so we cannot question it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process regarding the tree works.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings