Northumberland County Council (25 000 413)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to prune a tree close to the complainant’s property. There is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complains that the Council is at fault in declining to prune a tree close to her property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X has asked the Council to prune a tree on its land. She says the tree overhangs her property and blocks light to her garden. Her complaint concerns the Council’s response to her request.
  2. The Council says works to the tree are a low priority and it does not have the resources to carry out pruning. Miss X regards this position as unreasonable. In her view, the matter presents a serious safety concern warranting immediate attention.
  3. It is not for the Ombudsman to express a view on whether the tree should be pruned. That is for the Council. Miss X disagrees with the Council’s view but that does not mean it amounts to fault. The Council is entitled to prioritise how it uses its resources and there is no evidence of fault in the way it has done so here. That being the case, the Ombudsman cannot criticise the Council’s position or intervene to substitute an alternative view.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings