London Borough of Newham (24 015 422)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged failure by the Council to maintain a public tree. This is because the injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to carry out work to a tree on his road.
  2. Mr X said that as a result, the falling branches were causing a hazard to pedestrians.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In August 2023, the Council inspected a tree on Mr X’s road. Its written log showed work was required to remove some branches, thin the crown and remove some of the overhang. It classed the work as Priority One – Urgent and set a deadline of one week for it to be completed. The log recorded the risk category as ‘insignificant’.
  2. The Council did not carry out the work until August 2024. Mr X says however, that the Council’s contractors pruned the wrong tree and then reported the work as completed. As a result, when Mr X complained, the Council said the work had been done and it did not uphold his complaint.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. Even if we found the Council to be at fault for delaying in carrying out work, or indeed, carrying out the work on the wrong tree, there is no evidence Mr X has been caused any injustice from this. There is also insufficient evidence of potential injustice to the general public to investigate on that basis. Risk of harm in these specific circumstances, is not sufficient.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. Any injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings