Suffolk County Council (24 011 969)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about an overgrown tree on the toad opposite blocking the streetlight. This is because it does not meet the tests on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is no indication of fault in the Council’s decision that it will not be removed.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about a overgrown tree on the opposite side of the road that is blocking the streetlight. She says she has been paying for the tree to be pruned back for the last 18 years and would like the Council to cut it back.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended).
  2. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether you disagree with the decision the organisation made.
  3. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether you disagree with the decision the organisation made.
  2. The Council has told Mrs X that it has inspected the tree in question two times and found it does not need any action taken in line with its policy. It says it has commissioned a specialist report on the health of the tree and will feed this back when the report is completed.
  3. The Council also advised Mrs X that she can make an insurance claim if she considers the tree is damaging her property.
  4. As the Council’s decision has been taken after a tree inspection and consideration of its policy, we will not investigate. This is because we are unlikely to find indication of fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings