West Northamptonshire Council (24 006 005)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Aug 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a tree on a neighbouring property. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has failed to act to remove a dangerous tree on an unoccupied neighbouring property. He says the tree is unsafe, puts him and his property at risk and the matter is causing him distress. He wants the Council to remove the tree.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its complaint response to Mr X, the Council said it had assessed the tree and decided it did not pose a danger to property or public health. Because of this, it would not take any action. However, it told Mr X it would arrange a further inspection of the tree.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council has assessed the tree and considered Mr X’s concerns before reaching its decision that no action is needed. This is what we would expect. Although I accept Mr X disagrees with the Council’s position, we cannot question a decision taken without fault. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings