Surrey County Council (24 005 628)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to fell trees on its land. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to fell several trees on its land. He said the trees were protected by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) and the decision to fell them had defaced the local area. He said he had been caused distress by the Council’s actions. He wants the Council to review its policies, so it focuses on tree preservation. He also wants it to plant new trees in the affected area.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s arboriculturist inspected the trees and determined that one was dying, whilst another posed a potential risk. They decided removal of the trees was necessary. As the trees were located outside the Council’s area, it notified the relevant council’s planning department about the work needed to the trees. That council was the responsible authority for the TPO. It approved the remedial works.
  2. Although Mr X is unhappy with the Council’s actions, we will not investigate this complaint. The Council inspected the trees and followed the correct process of awaiting approval before their removal. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings