Cannock Chase District Council (23 017 466)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to maintain trees properly. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Mrs X complained the Council had not maintained the tress that grew at the rear of their property properly. They said the trees were overgrown and encroaching on their property. They want the Council to cut back the trees.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In the Council’s complaint response, it said it inspected the trees on a regular basis to identify if any trees needed maintenance. It said it used a risk management process to prioritise that work. It said it would not prune trees based on their height, or for blocking light from Mr and Mrs X’s garden. It said Mr and Mrs X could cut back any overhanging vegetation.
  2. Although Mr and Mrs X are unhappy with the Council’s response, we will not investigate. The Council has confirmed it routinely checks the trees, has completed a visit to their property and made its decision not to cut back the trees in line with its Urban Forestry Strategy. It has concluded the trees are not unsafe. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council considered their concerns to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr and Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings