Leicester City Council (23 013 560)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jan 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to the complainant’s request to remove or replace trees. This is because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr X, complains that the Council has refused his request to replace or remove trees on the street where he lives.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says Council-owned trees on the street where he lives drop berries which cause nuisance and damage to property. He has asked the Council to address the issue by removing the trees or replacing them with a species which does not drop berries. He complains that it has declined to do so.
  2. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. Where there is no evidence of fault in the way a Council makes a decision, we will not intervene to criticise the decision, or to substitute an alternative view. We would not criticise the Council for deciding that the removal of healthy trees is not justified in these circumstances. That is a matter for the professional judgement of the Council’s officers.
  3. If Mr X believes the berries have caused damage to his property, and that the Council is responsible for the damage, his recourse would be to take the matter to court. There is no role for the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings