Sheffield City Council (23 003 919)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to prune trees near his property. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has refused to sufficiently prune trees near his property. He says the trees drop an unacceptable amount of leaves and blossom onto his property and the branches block out natural light. He wants the Council to prune the trees to reduce their size.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s policy sets out how it manages trees it is responsible for in its area. The policy says it will not remove or prune trees solely to alleviate problems such as falling leaves or blossom, blockage of natural light, or to reduce the size of trees considered to be too large or overgrown.
  2. Mr X complained that trees near his property cause an unacceptable amount of leaf fall and blossom and blocked his natural light. In response to Mr X’s complaint, the Council visited his property to view the trees in question and consulted an arborist. It decided that, as the trees were healthy and not causing damage, it would not carry out further pruning of the trees.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. Although I accept Mr X disagrees with the Council’s decision, the decision appears to be in line with its policy. We cannot question a decision taken without fault. In this case, there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings