Cumbria County Council (22 003 584)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the protection of trees and rights of way during preparation work for a major road project. There is insufficient evidence of personal injustice which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the failure to protect mature trees and a right of way which was obstructed by contractors preparing for a road scheme.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr x said he walked on the route of a major road scheme and fond that contractors had fenced off the footpath during preparatory work. This caused him to make a difficult diversion and trespass on private land. He also noticed that a mature tree had been felled and another had vehicle tracks close to the root system.
  2. Mr X complained to the Council and it told him it had raised the matters with the contractor to ensure protection measures are in place when the work commences and footpath diversions are put in place. Any trees which are removed were identified during the planning process which involved public consultation in earlier years.
  3. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the protection of trees and rights of way during preparation work for a major road project. There is insufficient evidence of personal injustice which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings