Cambridge City Council (21 013 703)
Category : Environment and regulation > Trees
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 19 Jan 2022
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a remedial notice issued under high hedges legislation. Ms X exercised her right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate and the matter is outside our jurisdiction.
The complaint
- Ms X complained about the Council’s implementation of a High Hedges remedial notice on her under the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003. She says an initial letter in 2018 wrongly identified her property and the Council’s procedures for assessing the hedge were flawed. She says the action under the notice has caused unnecessary damage to her trees and claimed £10,000 in compensation from the Council.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
- The Planning Inspectorate is the body representing the Secretary of State with regard to appeals about high hedge remedial notices.
- We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Ms X says the Council served a remedial notice on her for the height of her hedge which has caused the neighbours to make a complaint. She says an initial letter wrongly identified her property and that the Council’s inspector did not carry out his assessments impartially or view from her property.
- The Council says the typing error was corrected in subsequent correspondence and the assessment and notice followed the correct procedure. It has a duty to responded to requests to consider high hedges under the legislation and its actions were part of the statutory process.
- Ms X challenged the remedial notice by appealing to the Planning Inspectorate. The appeal was unsuccessful, and the Planning Inspector made his own decision about the site. This decision is binding on the council and the parties involved and we have no authority to investigate once an appeal has been submitted, regardless of the outcome.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s this complaint about a remedial notice issued under high hedges legislation. Ms X exercised her right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate and the matter is outside our jurisdiction.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman